N° 137May 17
TT
Instagram@zara61/100FashionInstagram@notion74/100SaaSTikTok@decathlon52/100Sporting goodsInstagram@glossier79/100BeautyInstagram@patagonia82/100Outdoor apparelTikTok@liquiddeath71/100BeveragesInstagram@zara61/100FashionInstagram@notion74/100SaaSTikTok@decathlon52/100Sporting goodsInstagram@glossier79/100BeautyInstagram@patagonia82/100Outdoor apparelTikTok@liquiddeath71/100Beverages
Editorial showcase@notion

The Teardown Times

02

Case file · live extract

Tonight's featured extract @notion SaaS 30 posts read
InstagramIG@notion · Notion
Good

74/100

The verdict

Tidy, consistent, and quietly under-using its own audience.

Notion's feed is well-disciplined: clean illustrations, on-brand pastels, and a consistent grid. But the account behaves like a documentation channel, not a brand-building one. The opportunity isn't in posting more — it's in saying something the docs can't.

The three subscores
Performance71/100

Engagement rate of 0.42% is healthy for SaaS — top quartile in the category. Carousels with stated opinions punch above the median by 1.9×.

Editorial health78/100

Strong visual cohesion (95% on-brand frames) and a clear voice. The weakness is hook variety: 64% of posts open with a feature name instead of a problem.

Growth signals72/100

Cadence is consistent at 5.3 posts per week. Follower growth tracks the product release calendar, which signals dependency on launches rather than evergreen content.